OxTalks will soon move to the new Halo platform and will become 'Oxford Events.' There will be a need for an OxTalks freeze. This was previously planned for Friday 14th November – a new date will be shared as soon as it is available (full details will be available on the Staff Gateway).
In the meantime, the OxTalks site will remain active and events will continue to be published.
If staff have any questions about the Oxford Events launch, please contact halo@digital.ox.ac.uk
Racial disparities in policing are well documented. In addition to officer animus towards some groups (“taste-based discrimination”), these could be driven by officers’ beliefs that crime rates are higher in some communities (“statistical discrimination”). But where do these beliefs come from, and what if they are incorrect? We analyze a formal model where officers form beliefs using crime statistics, but make a common inferential mistake by not fully adjusting for the fact that they will detect more crime in more heavily policed communities. This creates a feedback loop where officers (incorrectly) believe there is relatively more crime in communities that are policed intensely, leading to persistent over-policing. We also show that discrimination driven by false beliefs is contagious across officers. This means that inferential mistakes can exacerbate discrimination even among officers with no animus and who sincerely believe disparities are driven by real differences in crime rates.
Link to paper: andrewtlittle.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/Institutional_Police_Bias-5.pdf
Please sign up for meetings here: docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1WTp83AxJaVGv6sMlwBer43q68i43dAe9BSeyb26ypa4/edit#gid=0
