BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:talks.ox.ac.uk
BEGIN:VEVENT
SUMMARY:How to End a Nuclear War: Deterrence and Provocation in War Termin
 ation - Lauren Sukin (University of Oxford)\, Sam Seitz (University of Oxf
 ord)
DTSTART;VALUE=DATE-TIME:20260310T160000Z
DTEND;VALUE=DATE-TIME:20260310T173000Z
UID:https://talks.ox.ac.uk/talks/id/43738136-710c-42b6-b995-c469c6105276/
DESCRIPTION:Is nuclear conflict manageable\, or does any use of nuclear we
 apons inexorably push states toward escalation? And how do these dynamics 
 differ between nuclear- and conventional-armed attacks? Many theorists hav
 e considered these questions\, but empirically answering them is difficult
  given the absence of historical data. We address this challenge by fieldi
 ng a pre-registered experimental survey of American adults designed around
  a series of hypothetical vignettes featuring attacks on the United States
 . The vignettes vary in the targets struck (conventional military installa
 tions\, nuclear facilities\, or civilian facilities) and the means of atta
 ck (conventional munitions or nuclear weapons). We then measure preference
 s over concession versus retaliation\, the form and intensity of retaliati
 on (including nuclear options)\, and respondents’ stated reasons for and
  against nuclear use. To probe mechanisms\, we capture emotional reactions
  and broader situational assessments using both closed-ended measures and 
 free-response prompts. By assessing the public’s response to various att
 acks across a range of targets\, our study identifies what actions are mor
 e (less) likely to generate public pressure for (de)escalation. And by pro
 bing the emotional reactions and logic evinced by respondents\, our study 
 offers potential insights into the affective microfoundations underlying n
 uclear conflict dynamics.\n\nDr Lauren Sukin is the John G. Winant Associa
 te Professor in US Foreign Policy in the Department of Politics and Intern
 ational Relations at the University of Oxford\, as well as a Professorial 
 Fellow in Nuffield College at the University of Oxford. Dr Sukin's researc
 h examines historical and contemporary challenges in international securit
 y\, focusing particularly on the role of technology—including nuclear we
 apons—in alliances. Dr Sukin is an Affiliate at Stanford University's Ce
 nter for International Security and Cooperation (CISAC)\, a Nonresident Sc
 holar in the Nuclear Policy Program at the Carnegie Endowment for Internat
 ional Peace\, and a Fellow at Charles University's Peace Research Centre P
 rague. She holds a PhD and MA from the Department of Political Science at 
 Stanford University and ABs in political science and literary arts from Br
 own University.\n\nDr Sam Seitz is a Postdoctoral Fellow at Oxford's Depar
 tment of Politics and International Relations and a Deterrence Futures Fel
 low at the Royal United Services Institute. He was previously a Stanton Nu
 clear Postdoctoral Fellow at MIT\, where he was affiliated with the Securi
 ty Studies Program. De Seitz’ work primarily concerns the causes and con
 sequences of states' military procurement choices and the effect of these 
 choices on alliance politics. He is especially interested in the way that 
 procurement choices relate to issues of nuclear strategy and the role that
  status and prestige concerns play in shaping military force postures. \nS
 peakers:\nLauren Sukin (University of Oxford)\, Sam Seitz (University of O
 xford)
LOCATION:Manor Road Building (Lecture Theatre)\, Manor Road OX1 3UQ
TZID:Europe/London
URL:https://talks.ox.ac.uk/talks/id/43738136-710c-42b6-b995-c469c6105276/
BEGIN:VALARM
ACTION:display
DESCRIPTION:Talk:How to End a Nuclear War: Deterrence and Provocation in W
 ar Termination - Lauren Sukin (University of Oxford)\, Sam Seitz (Universi
 ty of Oxford)
TRIGGER:-PT1H
END:VALARM
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
SUMMARY:Inter-alliance Security Dilemmas: Korean Counterforce Systems and 
 Their Effect on the Sino- American Nuclear Competition - Sam Seitz (Univer
 sity of Oxford)
DTSTART;VALUE=DATE-TIME:20240528T133000
DTEND;VALUE=DATE-TIME:20240528T150000
UID:https://talks.ox.ac.uk/talks/id/5843ab4e-c93a-43de-b766-2fbbb761222d/
DESCRIPTION:Cold War strategic competition was dominated by the actions of
  the US and USSR. Their material preponderance\, coupled with tightly inte
 grated multilateral alliances systems in Europe\, oriented competition aro
 und this central axis of competition. But the current environment is less 
 centralized\, characterized by cross-cutting alliances and interacting nuc
 lear dyads. How has this changed the nature of nuclear competition? We ass
 ess this question by considering the inter-Korean competition and its effe
 cts outside the peninsula. In response to North Korea’s acquisition of n
 uclear weapons\, Seoul has procured stealth aircraft and precision\, long-
 range missiles. It has also authorized the deployment of US missile defens
 e systems to its territory\, pursued greater nuclear coordination with Was
 hington\, and even threatened nuclear acquisition itself. These moves are 
 aimed at Pyongyang\, but they have spillover effects on China. Exploiting 
 new Chinese language military documents\, we show that South Korea’s inc
 reasingly sophisticated arsenal of counterforce systems is contributing to
  Beijing’s anxiety about the survivability of its nuclear arsenal\, help
 ing to spur China’s nuclear arsenal expansion. This has important implic
 ations both for the academic literature on alliances and arms racing as we
 ll as for policy debates surrounding Sino-American nuclear competition. In
  particular\, it suggests that alliances might not just entrap patrons in 
 wars but also in arms races. This creates a type of inter-alliance securit
 y dilemma\, where security spirals in one state dyad produce security spir
 als in separate state dyads. Further\, it reveals that contemporary strate
 gic competition in East Asia systematically differs from the Cold War due 
 to the existence of multiple cross-cutting alliances. This complicates sig
 naling efforts\, and\, by increasing the number of relevant actors\, augur
 s deep challenges for any efforts at bilateral nuclear arms control betwee
 n the US and China.\n\nSamuel Seitz is an incoming Stanton Nuclear Securit
 y Fellow in the MIT Security Studies Program and DPhil Candidate in Intern
 ational Relations at The University of Oxford. His research interests incl
 ude status-seeking in international relations\, nuclear strategy\, militar
 y procurement policy\, alliance politics\, and the ways in which they inte
 rsect. His work has been published in Contemporary Security Policy\, The W
 ashington Quarterly\, Foreign Affairs\, and The US-China Perception Monito
 r. Sam has also worked as a Summer Associate and Adjunct Researcher at the
  RAND Corporation. He received an M.A. in Security Studies and a B.S.F.S. 
 in International Politics from Georgetown University.\nSpeakers:\nSam Seit
 z (University of Oxford)
LOCATION:All Souls College (Old Library)\, High Street OX1 4AL
TZID:Europe/London
URL:https://talks.ox.ac.uk/talks/id/5843ab4e-c93a-43de-b766-2fbbb761222d/
BEGIN:VALARM
ACTION:display
DESCRIPTION:Talk:Inter-alliance Security Dilemmas: Korean Counterforce Sys
 tems and Their Effect on the Sino- American Nuclear Competition - Sam Seit
 z (University of Oxford)
TRIGGER:-PT1H
END:VALARM
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
SUMMARY:Purchasing Prestige or Seeking Security? Military Procurement Choi
 ces Between the Dual Pressures of Status Loss and Military Threats - Sam S
 eitz (University of Oxford)\, Patrick Gill-Tiney (University of Oxford)
DTSTART;VALUE=DATE-TIME:20230119T150000Z
DTEND;VALUE=DATE-TIME:20230119T163000Z
UID:https://talks.ox.ac.uk/talks/id/859103d4-9a47-4b38-b3e6-a2cdcadab6f9/
DESCRIPTION:Discussant: Patrick Gill-Tiney\nSpeakers:\nSam Seitz (Universi
 ty of Oxford)\, Patrick Gill-Tiney (University of Oxford)
LOCATION:Manor Road Building (Seminar Room A)\, Manor Road OX1 3UQ
TZID:Europe/London
URL:https://talks.ox.ac.uk/talks/id/859103d4-9a47-4b38-b3e6-a2cdcadab6f9/
BEGIN:VALARM
ACTION:display
DESCRIPTION:Talk:Purchasing Prestige or Seeking Security? Military Procure
 ment Choices Between the Dual Pressures of Status Loss and Military Threat
 s - Sam Seitz (University of Oxford)\, Patrick Gill-Tiney (University of O
 xford)
TRIGGER:-PT1H
END:VALARM
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
SUMMARY:NATO's Nordic Neophytes: How Sweden & Finland's Accession to NATO 
 Alters the Military Balance in Northeast Europe - Julia Carver (Universit
 y of Oxford)\, Sam Seitz (University of Oxford)
DTSTART;VALUE=DATE-TIME:20230307T130000Z
DTEND;VALUE=DATE-TIME:20230307T143000Z
UID:https://talks.ox.ac.uk/talks/id/f0647a84-1343-4fc1-aa93-67bbe083e4ba/
DESCRIPTION:Sandwiches will be available from 12.40\n\nDoes the accession 
 of Sweden and Finland to NATO alter the strategic balance in the Baltics? 
 Stockholm and Helsinki’s recent decision to join the alliance has render
 ed most analyses on this question moot\, as extant scholarship has focused
  on how the two countries could cooperate with NATO outside the alliance. 
 To redress this gap\, this paper assesses how Nordic NATO expansion shifts
  the military balance in northeast Europe by leveraging a mixed-methods ap
 proach of campaign models and elite interviews. Our campaign analyses sugg
 est the addition of Sweden and Finland expands NATO force projection capab
 ilities while simultaneously increasing the strain on Russia’s regional 
 air defense network. Interviews allow us to corroborate these findings aga
 inst the strategic assessments of key NATO and European policymakers\, and
  to probe the extent to which their strategic judgements mirror popular di
 scourse around NATO expansion. Our findings have critical policy and acade
 mic implications\, suggesting that Swedish and Finnish accession strengthe
 n NATO’s ability to reinforce the Baltics. Consequently\, Nordic expansi
 on is expected to reduce the odds of a Russian fait accompli in the region
 —thereby strengthening deterrence.\nSpeakers:\nJulia Carver (University 
 of Oxford)\, Sam Seitz (University of Oxford)
LOCATION:Manor Road Building (Lecture Theatre)\, Manor Road OX1 3UQ
TZID:Europe/London
URL:https://talks.ox.ac.uk/talks/id/f0647a84-1343-4fc1-aa93-67bbe083e4ba/
BEGIN:VALARM
ACTION:display
DESCRIPTION:Talk:NATO's Nordic Neophytes: How Sweden & Finland's Accession
  to NATO Alters the Military Balance in Northeast Europe - Julia Carver (
 University of Oxford)\, Sam Seitz (University of Oxford)
TRIGGER:-PT1H
END:VALARM
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR
