OxTalks will soon move to the new Halo platform and will become 'Oxford Events.' There will be a need for an OxTalks freeze. This was previously planned for Friday 14th November – a new date will be shared as soon as it is available (full details will be available on the Staff Gateway).
In the meantime, the OxTalks site will remain active and events will continue to be published.
If staff have any questions about the Oxford Events launch, please contact halo@digital.ox.ac.uk
Discriminated against in Turkey on the basis of their ethnic and religious identity, the Greek-speaking Orthodox Christians of Istanbul and Imbros (Gökçeada) overwhelmingly left their places of birth in the years c.1950-1980. Most settled in Greece, where they received a lukewarm reception from a government that saw them as abandoning historic Greek territories, and from segments of the population who viewed them with suspicion due to their Turkish birthplace. I explore the means through which this displaced community sought to (re)construct their understandings of home and national identity. Drawing parallels between the historian Alon Confino’s discussion of the Heimat idea in German nation building and the Greek concept of patrída – both of which can interchangeably refer to an abstract national homeland and a familiar local one – I demonstrate that the expatriated Greeks of Turkey respond to domestic Greek challenges to their legitimacy as ‘Greeks’ by emphasising rather than downplaying the particularities of their own local heritages. By claiming descent from the Byzantines or from ancient Athenian colonists, by casting themselves in the likeness of exemplary heroes from the Greek national past, and by professing a privileged lived knowledge of Greece’s Turkish Other, the Greeks of Turkey can simultaneously differentiate themselves from their detractors in Greece and portray themselves as particularly Greek. This ‘inclusive particularity’ indicates that national belonging may be constructed through attachment to the local rather than simply in opposition to it, thereby providing a conception of national identity that allows for its malleability in local contexts whilst also accounting for its capacity to sustain claims of national commonality.