OxTalks is Changing
OxTalks will soon move to the new Halo platform and will become 'Oxford Events.' There will be a need for an OxTalks freeze. This was previously planned for Friday 14th November – a new date will be shared as soon as it is available (full details will be available on the Staff Gateway).
In the meantime, the OxTalks site will remain active and events will continue to be published.
If staff have any questions about the Oxford Events launch, please contact halo@digital.ox.ac.uk
Against Consumer Boycotts
This webinar will be hosted via Zoom, please register using the link.
This paper addresses the morality of consumer boycotts. The boycotts Amy considers are assumed to pursue unquestionably good and just ends. Even so, she will argue that boycotts can be construed as a kind of violent protest: they share with violent protests efforts to coerce changes in conduct through violence or threats of violence. And she will argue that boycotts are presumptively wrong for an additional reason: they violate market norms.
Other theorists have argued that political boycotts are presumptively wrong because they seek to effectuate political change in a sphere that is not governed by democratic procedures, and because boycotts stand to undermine substantive policies produced through the democratic process. In other words, by the lights of these theorists, the problem with boycotts is that they seek democratic ends in an undemocratic sphere. Or, more pithily put, boycotts are anti-democratic.
Amy argues that there is an additional problem with boycotts – namely, that they are anti-market. In particular, she is going to argue that boycotts disrupt market activity in ways that are presumptively unfair to sellers and other buyers. More pithily put, boycotts are akin to looting because boycotts “rob” retail businesses – not of their merchandise, but of the opportunity to have a fair shot at competing for consumer dollars.
The paper ends by contrasting boycotts with conscientious consumerism. Amy argues that the state should permit conscientious consumerism more readily than boycotts, but only when the conscientious consumer is an individual, and not where it is a corporation.
Date:
3 December 2020, 16:00
Venue:
Venue to be announced
Speaker:
Amy Sepinwall (The Wharton School, The University of Pennsylvania)
Organising department:
Saïd Business School
Organisers:
Rita Mota (Saïd Business School, University of Oxford),
Alan Morrison (Saïd Business School)
Organiser contact email address:
reputation@sbs.ox.ac.uk
Hosts:
Rita Mota (Saïd Business School, University of Oxford),
Alan Morrison (Saïd Business School)
Part of:
R:ETRO - Reputation: Ethics, Trust, and Relationships at Oxford
Booking required?:
Required
Booking url:
https://www.cvent.com/events/r-etro-seminar-with-amy-sepinwall/registration-f605a95600fc48a0896a2d4174374656.aspx?fqp=true
Audience:
Public
Editor:
Sarah Livingstone