This project examines how public exposure to judicial non-compliance by state and non-state actors influences citizens’ willingness to mobilize and their attitudes toward the non-compliant parties. Recognizing courts’ limited enforcement powers, it explores the role of public opinion as a compliance mechanism and the potential mobilization through pro-compliance networks, such as NGOs and media. Through two survey experiments, the study assesses responses to varying levels of observed non-compliance and vagueness in judicial rulings. Hypotheses include that visible non-compliance increases public pressure for adherence, particularly when prior expectations are exceeded. This work provides insights into how judicial transparency and public scrutiny may bolster judicial compliance in new democracies, where institutional weaknesses can otherwise limit the enforceability of court decisions.