Oxford Events, the new replacement for OxTalks, will launch on 16th March. From now until the launch of Oxford Events, new events cannot be published or edited on OxTalks while all existing records are migrated to the new platform. The existing OxTalks site will remain available to view during this period.
From 16th, Oxford Events will launch on a new website: events.ox.ac.uk, and event submissions will resume. You will need a Halo login to submit events. Full details are available on the Staff Gateway.
From 1919 to 1932 in Britain, the Royal Commission on Awards to Inventors compensated private inventors of valuable WWI technologies. This paper asks what characteristics of invention mattered for the Commission’s judgments on merit. I find that they understood invention as a problem-solving process comprising both theoretical and empirical work –describing the ideal solution using known theorems, building a physical imitation by updating known devices, then iterating the prototype based on user feedback. Meritorious inventors presented either a novel solution or means of implementation; they also supervised iteration through to deployment. While partially similar to existing ideas about “inventor-entrepreneurs”, the Commission’s thought displays original insights into the nature of novelty, science versus technology, and the challenge of inventing for militaries. After reviewing the multi-disciplinary literature on invention, I elaborate the Commission’s philosophy and clarify its key features using three example rulings: dazzle camouflage, TNT manufacture, and fire control systems.
