OxTalks is Changing
On 28th November OxTalks will move to the new Halo platform and will become 'Oxford Events' (full details are available on the Staff Gateway).
There will be an OxTalks freeze beginning on Friday 14th November. This means you will need to publish any of your known events to OxTalks by then as there will be no facility to publish or edit events in that fortnight. During the freeze, all events will be migrated to the new Oxford Events site. It will still be possible to view events on OxTalks during this time.
If you have any questions, please contact halo@digital.ox.ac.uk
Do human rights trials affect anti-immigration perceptions?
The large number of refugees and migrants entering Europe, particularly since the so-called ‘refugee crisis’ of 2014-2015, contributed to an increase of anti-immigration sentiment. Meanwhile, European courts with the capacity for universal jurisdiction—the ability to prosecute grave atrocity crimes involving foreigners that occurred abroad—have found within their borders both the victims and alleged offenders of mass atrocity crimes. Literature suggests that mass atrocity trials serve a pedagogical function, informing the public about the nature of the crimes and promoting societal reconciliation. If so, could mass atrocity trials pursued under universal jurisdiction shape the natives’ attitudes on immigration? The study projects two competing mechanisms. On the one hand, the universal jurisdiction cases could highlight the humanitarian context of the refugees’ migration to Europe, ameliorating anti-immigration perceptions. On the other hand, by emphasizing the existence of perpetrators amongst refugees, the trials may serve to confirm the natives’ existing biases about migrants. Using responses to a list experiment as the dependent variable, an online survey experiment will assess whether different vignettes about universal jurisdiction cases alter the natives’ perceptions about refugees. The study will use three treatment vignettes depicting a hypothetical universal jurisdiction trial: representations of the case that are victim-centred, perpetrator-centred and neutral. The control group will read a vignette about a hypothetical plane crash. This survey experiment is a pilot for a series of studies that will assess how universal jurisdiction cases shape the attitudes of existing residents and the newly incoming immigrants.
Date:
1 June 2022, 14:00
Venue:
Butler Room
Venue Details:
This is a hybrid event--interested participants can attend in person or virtually via Zoom
Speaker:
Seung Hoon Chae (Oxford)
Organising department:
Nuffield College
Organiser:
Noah Bacine (University of Oxford)
Organiser contact email address:
noah.bacine@nuffield.ox.ac.uk
Host:
Noah Bacine (University of Oxford)
Part of:
CESS Colloquium Series
Booking required?:
Recommended
Booking url:
https://cess-nuffield.nuff.ox.ac.uk/events/colloquium/seung-hoon-chae-university-of-oxford/
Booking email:
noah.bacine@nuffield.ox.ac.uk
Audience:
Members of the University only
Editor:
Noah Bacine
