OxTalks will soon move to the new Halo platform and will become 'Oxford Events.' There will be a need for an OxTalks freeze. This was previously planned for Friday 14th November – a new date will be shared as soon as it is available (full details will be available on the Staff Gateway).
In the meantime, the OxTalks site will remain active and events will continue to be published.
If staff have any questions about the Oxford Events launch, please contact halo@digital.ox.ac.uk
Defining forgetting broadly as any failure to express an association after it was acquired, there appear to be four families of contributing mechanisms: (1) decay, (2) inadequate retrieval cues present at test, (3) displacement from working memory during acquisition or test, and (4) associative interference. Examination of the first three mechanisms suggests that the fourth is often the real underlying mechanism in those cases. The broad varieties of associative interference will be reviewed, with a critical question being whether they all obey the same basic rules. Orthogonal to the mechanism(s) of forgetting, one might ask about the fate of forgotten memories. I will present evidence that in many cases forgetting is reversible and recovery from forgetting fundamentally surprisingly challenges prevailing accounts of such diverse instances of forgetting as so-called disrupted reconsolidation and infantile amnesia. An argument will be presented that forgetting is active, inhibitory, and usually highly beneficial.