Oxford Events, the new replacement for OxTalks, will launch on 16th March. From now until the launch of Oxford Events, new events cannot be published or edited on OxTalks while all existing records are migrated to the new platform. The existing OxTalks site will remain available to view during this period.
From 16th, Oxford Events will launch on a new website: events.ox.ac.uk, and event submissions will resume. You will need a Halo login to submit events. Full details are available on the Staff Gateway.
Are party members in single-party regimes more community-minded than non-party members? Understanding who joins authoritarian parties has important implications for authoritarian party durability and legitimacy. Parties able to recruit the community-minded may be viewed with greater trust. We argue that mass-based authoritarian parties successfully attract more community-minded citizens. We test our theory using a behavioral recruitment experiment for women in two rural districts in Vietnam and find that party members are ten percentage points more likely to join a training program when primed by collective incentives than non-party members. By contrast, party members are less likely to join when incentivized with selective incentives. A follow-up charity experiment shows that those in the community-incentive treatment group donate more to charity, further suggesting community-mindedness at work. The theory and findings could explain citizen trust in Vietnam’s single-party regime and speak to a broader alternative pathway to single-party regime legitimacy.
