OxTalks will soon move to the new Halo platform and will become 'Oxford Events.' There will be a need for an OxTalks freeze. This was previously planned for Friday 14th November – a new date will be shared as soon as it is available (full details will be available on the Staff Gateway).
In the meantime, the OxTalks site will remain active and events will continue to be published.
If staff have any questions about the Oxford Events launch, please contact halo@digital.ox.ac.uk
Zoom: Join Zoom Meeting: zoom.us/j/99057170141?pwd=H6jZR72T3cJPLOU8iq5jSWNxz8YbBV.1
Meeting ID: 990 5717 0141; Passcode: 421752
Abstract: Discussions around electability are central in election campaigns, often targeting minority candidates. This paper examines two related questions: Why do electability concerns strongly affect minority candidates? How can we contrast such concerns? Focusing on voters’ perspective, I argue that three main factors fuel electability concerns, including perceptions of lack of electoral support for minority candidates, voters’ own prejudice, and the scarcity of successful examples of minority candidates. I also explain that providing voters with information on actual public support for minority rights and candidates reduces electability concerns. I test my expectations on minority candidates by focusing on LGBTQ+ candidates. I rely on three original datasets: the largest survey to date of LGBTQ+ candidates, which includes about 500 candidates; and two voter surveys, each conducted with about 2,000 U.S. respondents, where I embedded conjoint and priming experiments. Reducing electability concerns is important to avoid that they become self-fulfilling prophecies.
