OxTalks is Changing
            
                On 28th November OxTalks will move to the new Halo platform and will become 'Oxford Events' (full details are available on the Staff Gateway).
            
            
                There will be an OxTalks freeze beginning on Friday 14th November. This means you will need to publish any of your known events to OxTalks by then as there will be no facility to publish or edit events in that fortnight. During the freeze, all events will be migrated to the new Oxford Events site. It will still be possible to view events on OxTalks during this time.
            
            
                If you have any questions, please contact halo@digital.ox.ac.uk
            
         
     
 
            
            
Court Presidents: The Missing Piece in the Puzzle of Judicial Self-Governance
    
Change of Topic
    
	The aim of this paper is to provide a new comprehensive understanding of roles of court presidents in judicial governance in Europe. It argues that in order to understand better the role of court presidents in comparative perspective it is necessary to unpack their power into smaller components that can be analyzed separately. We define seven such components: judicial career, jurisprudential, administrative, financial, ambassadorial, and media power, and ancillary powers as a residual category. Subsequently, we zero in on selected European jurisdictions, both in the West and East Europe, and rate them according to the strength of their court presidents’ powers. By doing so we develop a Court President Power Index. However, we also show that powers are not everything and that various contingent circumstances (such as the length of court presidents’ term, the role of individuals, information asymmetry, existence of competing judicial self-government bodies, institutional design of the judiciary, proximity of court presidents to political leaders, legal profession, legal culture, and political environment) affect to what extent court presidents may exploit their powers in practice. Finally, we question the widely held opinion that the West and East Europe view the roles of court presidents differently, and provide a more nuanced picture. More specifically, we argue that powers of court presidents diverge widely both within the West Europe and within the East Europe and hence it is difficult to draw the easy line along the West/East axis on this ground.
	(co-authored with Adam Blisa, PhD candidate in Law, Masaryk University)
Date:
16 November 2018, 14:00
Venue:
  Manor Road Building, Manor Road OX1 3UQ
  
Venue Details:
  Seminar Room F
  
Speaker:
  
    Dr David Kosař (Masaryk University)
  
    
Organising department:
    Centre for Socio-Legal Studies
    
Organisers:
    
        Filip Bubenheimer (University of Oxford), 
    
        Simon Drugda (University of Oxford), 
    
        Etienne Hanelt (University of Oxford)
    
    
Organiser contact email address:
    simon.drugda@wolfson.ox.ac.uk
    
Part of:
    OxonCourts
Booking required?:
Not required
Audience:
Members of the University only
    
Editors: 
      Katie Hayward, 
    
      Etienne Hanelt