On 28th November OxTalks will move to the new Halo platform and will become 'Oxford Events' (full details are available on the Staff Gateway).
There will be an OxTalks freeze beginning on Friday 14th November. This means you will need to publish any of your known events to OxTalks by then as there will be no facility to publish or edit events in that fortnight. During the freeze, all events will be migrated to the new Oxford Events site. It will still be possible to view events on OxTalks during this time.
If you have any questions, please contact halo@digital.ox.ac.uk
To reserve a time to meet with the speaker, please enter your name into the following form:
docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1puv8P-yW_4tsikYxW9JlsTvBMAI2A0n1oJ0cY-xMcz8/edit#gid=0
Abstract:
This paper presents a novel channel how openness to trade can increase regional economic inequality in advanced economies due to spatial sorting. I embed selection into exporting and trade due to endowment-driven comparative advantage into a multi-sector economic geography model with heterogeneous firms. The model yields two novel mechanisms through which opening to trade increases the spatial concentration of economic activity, one at the firm level and another at the industry level. Firstly, firms in larger cities are more productive and will expand due to trade-induced within-industry reallocation. Secondly, sectors located in larger cities are less labour intensive and will expand due to trade-induced across-industry reallocation according to comparative advantage. I test the model predictions using the rise in Chinese import competition vis-a-vis the United States. I find that on average a sector in a large commuting zone (at the 75th percentile of the city size distribution) loses 1.07 percentage points of employment due to the increase in Chinese import competition while the average sector in a small commuting zone (25th percentile) loses 2.09 percentage points, a loss almost twice as large. Decomposing the effect of trade on cities of different sizes I find that 53\% of this differential impact on employment is driven by firm heterogeneity, while 27\% is driven by across industry heterogeneity, and the remainder by the positive interaction of both effects. The relative importance of the firm-level channel implies that trade integration, even among similar countries, can substantially increase regional inequality even when there is no reallocation according to comparative advantage.
To view the related paper, please use the following link:
www.dropbox.com/s/2py1gz4j2ilheht/Bakker201801_TradeRegionalInequality.pdf?dl=0
