OxTalks will soon be transitioning to Oxford Events (full details are available on the Staff Gateway). A two-week publishing freeze is expected in early Hilary to allow all events to be migrated to the new platform. During this period, you will not be able to submit or edit events on OxTalks. The exact freeze dates will be confirmed as soon as possible.
If you have any questions, please contact halo@digital.ox.ac.uk
An essential component of any democracy is the extent to which citizens can hold legislators accountable via a meaningful threat of electoral defeat. We show that the (precisely calibrated) probability of defeat for an incumbent member of the US House of Representatives has been surprisingly high and nearly constant for at least two thirds of a century. This result coexists with massive and well documented changes in measures of incumbency advantage, electoral margins, ideological polarization, and partisanship. Our interpretation, supported by a new generative statistical model that we validate with extensive out-of-sample tests, is that these are intermediate variables that reflect different states of the partisan battlefield, and lead in interestingly different ways in different periods to the same probability of incumbent loss. Many other challenges to American democracy remain, but this core feature has remained durable.
[This is joint work with Danny Ebanks and Jonathan Katz]