On 28th November OxTalks will move to the new Halo platform and will become 'Oxford Events' (full details are available on the Staff Gateway).
There will be an OxTalks freeze beginning on Friday 14th November. This means you will need to publish any of your known events to OxTalks by then as there will be no facility to publish or edit events in that fortnight. During the freeze, all events will be migrated to the new Oxford Events site. It will still be possible to view events on OxTalks during this time.
If you have any questions, please contact halo@digital.ox.ac.uk
Abstract:
We analyse competition in settings where customers vary in how many price offers they compare; some are ‘captive’ to just one supplier. Allowing firms to discriminate between customer types (captive or not) is bad for consumers overall when firms are symmetric and consumers cannot affect how many offers they see, but may be good otherwise. The effects of entry by a new firm depend on its pattern – i.e. which consumer segments the entrant serves. Entry within a non-captive segment is bad for consumers, but entry is pro-consumer in the case of ‘independent reach’, for which we also examine merger effects. A different type of mixed strategy equilibrium appears in the case of ‘nested reach’, with different firms competing in high and low price ranges. To explore how market outcomes depend on the pattern of competition, we solve the general three-firm case.
