Oxford Events, the new replacement for OxTalks, will launch on 16th March. From now until the launch of Oxford Events, new events cannot be published or edited on OxTalks while all existing records are migrated to the new platform. The existing OxTalks site will remain available to view during this period.
From 16th, Oxford Events will launch on a new website: events.ox.ac.uk, and event submissions will resume. You will need a Halo login to submit events. Full details are available on the Staff Gateway.
Background: The “Fresh Eyes” approach is widely promoted in UK maternity policy as a safety intervention to reduce error, support escalation and prevent avoidable harm in intrapartum fetal monitoring. National drivers have driven rapid implementation despite limited clarity about its empirical evidence base, creating a need to establish what evidence exists, how the approach is understood in practice, and where key gaps remain.
Methods: This scoping review followed Joanna Briggs Institute methodology and was reported in line with PRISMA-ScR guidance. Searches were conducted in October 2025 across six databases (MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL Plus, Scopus, MIDIRS and PubMed) and supplemented by structured grey literature and citation searching. No language limits were applied. Two reviewers (MHP, DF) independently screened and extracted data using a purpose-designed charting tool. Data were analysed descriptively and mapped across domains of effectiveness, acceptability, feasibility and implementation, equity and accessibility, and psychological safety.
Results: 54 sources were included, comprising mainly policy documents, national reports, professional guidance, audits, quality improvement projects and qualitative or observational studies. No sources evaluated outcomes to test or demonstrate the effectiveness of “Fresh Eyes”. Most described it as a safety-support or governance process. Definitions and operationalisation varied widely, with heterogeneity in terminology, reviewer role, modality of monitoring, documentation and expectations. Evidence on acceptability was predominantly staff-focused, with minimal reporting of women’s or companions’ experiences. Feasibility was discussed in relation to staffing, workload and organisational culture. Equity, accessibility and psychological safety were rarely examined explicitly.
Conclusions: Despite strong policy endorsement, the “Fresh Eyes” approach is not supported by empirical evidence demonstrating effectiveness. It appears to function primarily as a governance and safety-culture intervention rather than a clearly evaluated clinical strategy. The literature shows substantial variation in implementation and a lack of rigorous evaluation of outcomes, equity and lived experience. Further research is needed to examine how “Fresh Eyes” operates in practice, whether it contributes to safer maternity care, and how women and birthing partner experience it.
