OxTalks will soon move to the new Halo platform and will become 'Oxford Events.' There will be a need for an OxTalks freeze. This was previously planned for Friday 14th November – a new date will be shared as soon as it is available (full details will be available on the Staff Gateway).
In the meantime, the OxTalks site will remain active and events will continue to be published.
If staff have any questions about the Oxford Events launch, please contact halo@digital.ox.ac.uk
We exploit India’s 2006 reform of Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) regulations to assess whether decentralising environmental regulations improve firms’ pollution abatement behaviours and their impacts on firm performance. Using a nationally representative panel of registered manufacturing firms from 2002 to 2018, we exploit temporal and industry-level variation using a difference-in-differences strategy to estimate impacts of decentralisation at the firm, industry-state and district levels. We then explore heterogeneous effects of decentralisation by regulatory stringency, prior regulatory compliance, and construction of local regulatory authorities at the state level. For formal sector firms, we find that decentralisation reduced the likelihood of installing pollution control machineries, led to large and persistent reductions in investments and employment, but also reduced fuel intensity. We further examine spillover effects of decentralisation on unregistered firms in the informal sector, finding that districts more exposed to decentralisation saw faster informal sector employment and output growth. Overall, these results suggest India’s decentralisation of environmental clearance was not effective at improving firm pollution control and brought with it economic costs.