On 28th November OxTalks will move to the new Halo platform and will become 'Oxford Events' (full details are available on the Staff Gateway).
There will be an OxTalks freeze beginning on Friday 14th November. This means you will need to publish any of your known events to OxTalks by then as there will be no facility to publish or edit events in that fortnight. During the freeze, all events will be migrated to the new Oxford Events site. It will still be possible to view events on OxTalks during this time.
If you have any questions, please contact halo@digital.ox.ac.uk
Abstract
While digital advance directives, such as the P4 system, have been presented as promising alternatives to surrogate decision-making, these systems have also faced criticism for being potentially misguided and even unethical. In this presentation, I critically examine two objections to the dominant emphasis on the loss of autonomous choice, with the aim of re-evaluating the philosophical foundations of digital advance directives through the lens of family ethics. First, I analyse how the debate surrounding digital advance directives is misleading in its focus on proxy decision-making as merely a matter of reproducing preferences. This narrow conception of autonomy overlooks the fact that such decisions often involve shared agency and familial responsibility. Second, I argue that the current literature largely ignores issues of social and epistemic injustice—concerns that cannot be dismissed in the ethical evaluation of these technologies. The presentation concludes by addressing a potential objection: that incorporating a family ethics perspective might reinforce irrational preferences for maintaining the status quo.
This will be a hybrid meeting in the Richard Doll Building Lecture Theatre and on Zoom (medsci.zoom.us/j/96943361305)
