OxTalks will soon be transitioning to Oxford Events (full details are available on the Staff Gateway). A two-week publishing freeze is expected in early Hilary to allow all events to be migrated to the new platform. During this period, you will not be able to submit or edit events on OxTalks. The exact freeze dates will be confirmed as soon as possible.
If you have any questions, please contact halo@digital.ox.ac.uk
Content, Conversation, Discourse, Multimodal, Narrative, Rhetorical, Stylistic, Thematic…Analysis. You might have encountered a few of these approaches to qualitative data in educational research already, perhaps also in studying English language, literature or linguistics. They imbue activities such as reading (and re-reading) a policy document or interview transcript with an appealing air of empiricism, even positivism. They can seem like a lifesaver if you’re working in an environment that favours such epistemologies. But how far can you get in the social sciences, particularly educational research, with close reading? … that ill-defined activity at the core of English studies. I will answer this drawing on my educational research that pairs close-reading with other methods, such as survey, or combines close-reading literary and non-literary texts. These include picturebooks, television, theatre reviews, websites, YA literature and YouKu videos. I will offer tips for explaining what you’re doing and how, when you put close-reading at the heart of your project. Difficulty with articulating this, rather than doing the close-reading, is arguably what makes undertaking close-reading as an educational research method most perilous.