Oxford Events, the new replacement for OxTalks, will launch on 16th March. From now until the launch of Oxford Events, new events cannot be published or edited on OxTalks while all existing records are migrated to the new platform. The existing OxTalks site will remain available to view during this period.
From 16th, Oxford Events will launch on a new website: events.ox.ac.uk, and event submissions will resume. You will need a Halo login to submit events. Full details are available on the Staff Gateway.
TORCH/Oxford Comparative Criticism and Translation Research Programme in conjunction with the John Fell Fund project “I & We: Literary Texts and the Constitution of Shared Identities at Four Moments of Historical Transition”
What Can Literature Teach us about Personal and Collective Identification?
Part I Wednesday 12th February (4th Week): Dan Zahavi and Naomi Rokotnitz
Part II Wednesday 13th May (3rd Week): Felix Budelmann and Ben Morgan
Dan Zahavi (Copenhagen and St Hilda’s): “I, You and We”
This talk will present some of the challenges facing a plausible account of we-intentionality. I will discuss and criticize a couple of different recent approaches that either claim that the ‘we’ precedes individual subjectivity or that ‘we-ness’ involves a kind of phenomenal fusion, and instead defend the view that reciprocal second-person engagement plays a crucial role in the emergence of a ‘we.’
Naomi Rokotnitz (Worcester): How ‘We’ contribute to ‘I’: Part I – Personification, Make-believe Play and Existential Choice
This paper tests the hypothesis that forms of personification can intervene in the productive interchange between a subject and his or her social environment, contributing in significant ways to formations of the self and that self’s relations to others, as well as suggesting criteria by which to define authentic being-in-the-world and, in particular, “relational authenticity” (Gallagher, Morgan, Rokotnitz 2018). Analysis of two short literary episodes will synthesize an approach to authentic selfhood that is rooted in the existential tradition in philosophy, extends to account for a 4E approach to subjectivity (as embodied, embedded, enactive and extended), and demonstrates how this may be made explicit and available for interrogation in fictional texts.