Oxford Events, the new replacement for OxTalks, will launch on 16th March. From now until the launch of Oxford Events, new events cannot be published or edited on OxTalks while all existing records are migrated to the new platform. The existing OxTalks site will remain available to view during this period.
From 16th, Oxford Events will launch on a new website: events.ox.ac.uk, and event submissions will resume. You will need a Halo login to submit events. Full details are available on the Staff Gateway.
Recent scholarship argues that affluence begets policy influence, thereby questioning whether contemporary democracy lives up to its key promise of formal political equality. A strong empirical emphasis of this scholarship, however, has left fundamental analytical issues unresolved with implications for the conclusions. In this article, I develop an analytical framework in order to solve two central, unresolved issues: (1) the representational implications of formal political equality, and (2) the necessary conditions for policy influence. I first apply the framework to reanalyze the original data of three cross-national studies, and then to analyze a new dataset covering 23 advanced democracies between 1985 and 2016. The analysis demonstrates that the current comparative work greatly exaggerates the policy influence of the affluent, and instead points to the optimistic conclusion that advanced democracies generally fulfil the democratic creed of ‘one person, one vote’.
