Oxford Events, the new replacement for OxTalks, will launch on 16th March. From now until the launch of Oxford Events, new events cannot be published or edited on OxTalks while all existing records are migrated to the new platform. The existing OxTalks site will remain available to view during this period.
From 16th, Oxford Events will launch on a new website: events.ox.ac.uk, and event submissions will resume. You will need a Halo login to submit events. Full details are available on the Staff Gateway.
The late nineteenth century and early twentieth century saw the establishment of a distinct form of science writing, “popular” science writing. Ostensibly directed towards the “laity” or the “man in the street,” it also enabled communication between scientists in distinct sub-disciplines, and may have been directed towards those who controlled university funding.
Its status in relation to technical science writing has been extensively debated, in books by Shinn and Whitley (1985), and articles by Hilgartner (1990), Cooter and Pumfrey (1994), Myers (2003), Secord (2004), O’Connor (2009), Schmalzer (2012) among others. Scholars in the field of literature and science have also studied it, and the present paper, as well as discussing what we are to do with the contested term “popular,” will ask what literary studies can bring to the study of popular science writing. It will focus on examples primary from the physical sciences in the early twentieth century, including work by A S Eddington and Oliver Lodge.
Professor Michael H Whitworth is the author of Einstein’s Wake: Relativity, Metaphor, and Modernist Literature (2001) and many other articles and chapters on literature and science. He was the co-founder, with Alice Jenkins, of the British Society for Literature and Science. He is a Tutorial Fellow in English at Merton College and Professor of Modern Literature and Culture in the English Faculty.
