Oxford Events, the new replacement for OxTalks, will launch on 16th March. From now until the launch of Oxford Events, new events cannot be published or edited on OxTalks while all existing records are migrated to the new platform. The existing OxTalks site will remain available to view during this period.
From 16th, Oxford Events will launch on a new website: events.ox.ac.uk, and event submissions will resume. You will need a Halo login to submit events. Full details are available on the Staff Gateway.
This paper discusses one of the oddest productions of English philosophical prose in the seventeenth century: Nathaniel Fairfax’s The Treatise of the Bulk and Selvedge of the World (1674). Fairfax’s Treatise attempted, through critical engagement with more prominent philosophical figures such Descartes, Samuel Parker, and Henry More, to think through ‘two puzling things, the maximum quantum and the minimum’: what is the greatest extent of matter, and what the least; whether body can be infinitely extended or diminished. What is strangest about Fairfax’s discussion is less his argument for a finite world and limited extension, than his method: to write an English metaphysics, shorn of terms derived from Greek and Latin, so that, for example, space, time, extension, rationality, impenetrability, and reality become ‘roomthyness’, ‘longsomness’, ‘bulksomness’, ‘thinkfullness’, ‘unthroughfareness’, and ‘thingsomeness’. Most discussions of Fairfax dismiss his writing as quaint or eccentric; this paper argues that his linguistic oddities in fact discover in the morphological patterns of English analogies with the metaphysical world-picture for which he argues, in thought- and word-experiments which take thought to its limits.